Wednesday, April 24, 2019

If you build it, will it happen? Designing a project to implement a new clinical service


Stephanie Sun MD MS
Fellow in Rural Health Leadership at Massachusetts General Hospital
PGY-5

April 10, 2019

Point of care ultrasound puts the ultrasound in the hands of the provider at the bedside of the patient. It is huge in acute care settings like emergency medicine where getting to a timely diagnosis is critical. It’s also been shown to assist with diagnostic uncertainty, in some cases reducing the number of additional studies performed, and improves patient satisfaction. But it’s not only the patients in emergency rooms who might benefit from ultrasound at the bedside.

As a general internist who provides care on a Native American reservation in remote rural South Dakota, point of care ultrasound has the potential to help bridge logistical gaps in care. The next closest hospital to my clinic in South Dakota is 50 miles away. But if patients are requiring specialty services, they will find themselves travelling 220 miles (that’s 3 hours and 42 minutes drive) to the nearest academic center in Sioux Falls – a huge burden on our patients! If a patient is going to be making a trip that far from family and their community of support, we want to make sure that it is necessary with the best clinical certainty possible. With a point of care ultrasound in hand, my ability to screen and triage is taken to the next level.

An ultraportable handheld ultrasound about to be put into action
If point of care ultrasound is so great, why isn’t it already being used in every rural clinic in the country? Great question. The most commonly raised concerns are 1) obtaining training, 2) maintaining skills, and oh yes 3) obtaining an ultrasound. Fortunately, new technologies have led to the release of ultraportable handheld ultrasounds at much lower price points than traditional machines. But even with a machine, patient safety must come first. It would be hard to feel comfortable trying a new skill if you are practicing somewhere where there is no one around who can teach it to you or provide the feedback needed to continue to improve.

As a resident, I was fortunate enough to get to create and build an ultrasound curriculum for general internal medicine residents. Taking many lessons from our emergency medicine colleagues, we learned basic skills to pick up on depressed ejection fractions, pneumothoraxes, and free fluid in the abdomen. Now as someone who mainly practices in the outpatient setting, I wonder which other exams would be the most useful to the primary care provider.

With support from the COE in Healthcare Quality and Patient Safety, I’ll be able to acquire an ultra-portable handheld ultrasound. We’ll be training a few fellow rural physicians affiliated with both MGH and the rural South Dakota clinic in ultrasound skills, and tracking their use in South Dakota. Which exams are they using it for? How often are they using it? Feedback will be provided to them on their interpretations of images to help them continue to hone their skills.

While we work through the IRB process, I’ve held two ultrasound scan sessions where a small group of rural physicians has been learning the ins and outs of point of care ultrasound. We’ve even done some scanning on “healthy volunteers,” that is, each other. We’ll be meeting again to keep building our skills and comfort before heading to the wards to practice more scans.

Along the way I’ve reflected on all the skills we’ve gained along our journey as trainees, and how a skill can go from total unfamiliar territory to the routine. It is exciting to see how a new skill can percolate through a discipline, like point of care ultrasound is through internal medicine. By learning lessons from those who have done it before us, and adapting the tools to suit our unique needs, we’ll continue to push boundaries to provide the best clinical care to all populations.

Comparison of cost-effectiveness of admitting moderately injured patients to trauma intermediate care units vs. surgical intensive care units.


Naveen Fatima Sangji, MD
Fellow in Burn Surgery at MGH
PGY 8

April 12, 2019


As a surgical critical care fellow, I was interested in comparing the cost-effectiveness of admitting moderately injured patients to a trauma intermediate care unit vs. a surgical intensive care unit.  Preparing an application for the COE Quality and Safety grants was a great impetus to get this project off the ground and to see it through.  An immediate and tangible benefit of getting funded was that COE staff were able to liaison with the MGH Finance division to help us get access to the cost and reimbursement data we needed.  We were also able to utilize the funds to obtain software and educational materials for our research.  An intangible but more significant benefit was that the application process gave me an introduction on how to prepare a grant application as a trainee.  The experience will serve me well as I prepare to apply for both institutional and extramural grant funding for future endeavors. 

With the support of my project mentor Dr. David King, our research team which includes trauma research fellow Majed el-Hechi has made significant progress on the project.  We presented our work at the MGH SAC 2019 Research Meeting and were very pleased to receive a “Poster of Distinction” award.  We are currently preparing a manuscript to report our findings.

Many thanks to the COE leadership for funding and supporting this project.